Student News of Skutt Catholic High School

The Flightline

  • Student Directed One Acts on Friday and Saturday at 7:30 pm.

  • Net Neutrality Vote takes place Dec. 14th

  • Half of service hours need to be Approved by Dec. 15th.

  • All students traveling to Spain on the Spring Break trip - there will be a meeting 12/13 at 3:15 in A150.

  • Attend Pollen Nation meetings Tuesdays at 7:15 in Mrs. Fuelberth's room

  • If you are interested in study abroad: see the educational opportunities bulletin board in the guidance office

  • Check the bulletin board in the guidance office for several new employment opportunities

“Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

2017 remake is Dead On Arrival compared to the 1990 original

Photo by Colombia Pictures

Photo by Colombia Pictures

Natalie Pearson, Staff Reporter

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






For many moviegoers, “Flatliners” seemed like it came out of nowhere. Being an obscure movie and having a generic plot, it did little to drum up much interest for me personally. However, a few social media platforms hopped on the “Flatliners” bandwagon. For example, Spotify created a new feature where it gives you song suggestions that presumably matches your heart rhythm to promote the movie. Soon enough it got to the point where I felt saturated in “Flatliners” advertisements, which was practically inconceivable for a movie like this, rising from obscurity to stardom in the span of a few weeks.

The over usage of advertisements became a little unsettling for such an underwhelming film. Later I learned that the reason for all this (undeserved) hype was that it was a reboot of a 1990 film of the same name, which starred Kiefer Sutherland and other famous actors.

“Flatliners” highlights the story of five medical students who conduct a dangerous experiment to see what lies after death. This experiment involves stopping their heart and then reviving them and recording what they saw in the afterlife. It’s a total success, and they’re ecstatic at the idea of having done something thought impossible. Then somehow their past comes back to haunt them as a consequence for playing god.

It was an interesting concept that managed to spark some curiosity. Plus, I wanted to see how it fared to the original, which critics touted as “remarkable” and “an original, intelligent thriller.”

So I decided to give it a shot. Walking into the theater, I was not sure what I expected, but I thought it was okay. Certainly not memorable, or life-changing, but it was a fun watch at the time. It was the bare minimum of entertainment and got the job done, at the very least. But the more I thought about it, the more I disliked it. It was a mediocre movie with a lackluster plot. 

The main characters are cookie-cutter and basic. Each of them fit into a trope (the rich guy, the shy guy, the pretty girl and the smart girl) and did nothing to make me sympathize or connect with them. When my favorite character died I didn’t actually care; it felt like her death was mostly meant for the shock factor and it didn’t have any real weight behind it.

Another thing I did not like was the ghosts. After flatlining, almost all of the characters saw some sort of ghost from their past, literally. There was a reason for why they were seeing the ghosts, but the transition from the first half of the movie to the second felt so disjointed it could have been preceded by anything. It was akin to a horror show rather than a dramatic psychological thriller, filled with chase scenes and jumpscares galore.

They didn’t even so much as touch on my favorite concept; the whole reason I went to go see the movie in the first place. After the characters flatlined, they gained supernatural powers. I was excited to see how they would explain this in detail. In actuality, one minor character made an offhand comment about it and then moved on, never to speak of it again for the rest of the film.

Needless to say, I was disappointed.

To sum it up, Flatliners was a “meh” movie. It definitely wasn’t great, or even good. In general, it was a forgettable experience and a dull movie. Don’t go to the theater—Flatliners is a waste of money and a waste of time.

Natalie Pearson - Staff Reporter

Natalie became a member of The Flightline in August of 2017. She is a sophomore this year involved in band at Skutt Catholic and volunteers at HETRA outside of school. You can email her at [email protected]

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    News

    Wildfires Wreaking Havoc on Southern California

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    BirdFeed

    Man Presented Key To City For Going 25 On Bob Boozer That One Time

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Indepth

    Everything You Need to Know About Net Neutrality

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Daily News

    Jones Defeats Moore in Alabama Senate Race

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Fall

    Let the Bowl Games Begin

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    BirdFeed

    11 Tumblr Memes to Distract You From Finals

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Entertainment

    Swartz’s Deli: Classy Comfort Food with New Jersey Flair

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Daily News

    Varsity Basketball Teams Suffer Two Losses

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Winter

    Burke Invitational Opens Swim Season

  • “Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?

    Daily News

    “Silence Breakers” Named Time Person of the Year

Student News of Skutt Catholic High School
“Flatliners” Review: Do Not Resuscitate or Do Not Reboot?